From each of the furniture forms, the chair could be of the most importance. While most of the other objects (except the bed) are designed to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair is used here in the most open sense, from stool to throne to derivative makes for example a bench or sofa, which should be viewed as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously definitive.
The social history of the chair is as exciting as its history as art and craft. The chair is not just a physical support and/or aesthetic item; it was also symbolic of social ranking. Within the old royal courts there were plain differences between being seated on a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but without arms, or worse having to utilise a stool. From the recent century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has been seen as a symbol of superior status, like in democratic government meeting the speaker sits on an elevated platform.
In a furniture form, the chair is used for a wealth of various makes. There are chairs designed to match man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to indicate his standing in society (the executive chair, the throne). From historical times there were chairs used for birth (birth chairs); since the 20th century, there have been chairs for ending life (the electric chair). We make chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can make chairs that can be folded for easy storage, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern day living has developed new chairs in automobiles and aircraft. All these chair types has changed to suit to evolving human uses. Due to its unique connection with man, the chair comes to its full advantage only when utilised. Whereas it isn’t relevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a set of drawers if there is anything inside or not, a chair is really seen and regarded best by a person sitting on it, for chair and sitter need each other. Thus the various parts of the chair have been named as the elements of a human body: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the primary job of a chair is to support a human body, its credit is valued primarily for how completely it fulfills this practical use. Within the construction of the chair, the chair maker is limited under certain static laws and principal measurements. Under these limitations, however, the chair creator has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair lasted over an epoch of several thousand years. There are societies that had made distinctive chair types, expressive of the highest craft in the spheres of skill and creativity. Within such cultures, a mention can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the reigns of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the result of masterful design, are known from tomb findings. First of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The original Egyptian chair would have had four legs crafted similar to those of a chosen animal, a curved seat, and leading to a sloping back supported with vertical stretchers. From this a solid triangular form was created. There was from our understanding no notable differentiation from the design of Egyptian thrones and chairs for regular populace. The only variation was in the brand of ornamentation, in the selection of pricey inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all likelihood was manufactured for an easily portable seat for soldiers. As a camp stool this type continued for much later times. But the stool then existed in the role of a ceremonial seat, its technical history as a folding stool neglected or forgotten. This can from evidence be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, crafted in ebony with ivory inlay ornamentation and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were made in the form of folding stools but can not be folded as the seats were made of wood. The plain manufacture of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that turn on metal bolts and hold a seat of leather or fabric secured between them, came up at some time later as the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best known of those is the folding stool, made out of ashwood, seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The significant Greek chair, the klismos, is known not as any ancient item still existing but as found in a variety of pictorial objects. The significant kind is the klismos seen on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location outside Athens (c. 410 BC). This is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of these legs are shown. These unique legs were understood to have been manufactured from bent wood and were in that case needed to bear a large amount of pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints joining the legs to the frame of the seat had to be therefore extremely durable and were particularly pointed out.
The Romans adopted the Greek style; some statues of seated Romans offer examples of a denser and which appear to be a rather more crudely constructed klismos. Both styles, the light and heavy, were revived in the Classicist epoch. The klismos influence is known in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in some special kinds of profound iconicism around Denmark and Sweden around 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China is not able to be tracked as far as the progression of the chairs in Egypt and Greece. Since the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unbroken folio of sketches and artworks had been kept, detailing the interior and outer parts of Chinese households and the kinds of furniture. Also preserved since the 16th century are some chairs crafted from wood or lacquered wood, that show an interesting familiarity to pictures of older chairs.
Just as in Egypt, there existed two major chair designs in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. This chair can be seen both with and without arms although never without its square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to firm the back. In one style, it has been found, the stiles had been delicately curved above the arms in order to sit right with the angle of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of the back). Together, the three sections are mortised into the yoke-like top rail. Although the innovation of a back splat then had an introduction for English chairs within the Queen Anne period, wooden sections that only to a restricted ability support corner joints (and were loose additionally) represent a design exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs pass through the seat frame, which closes around the rounded staves. All the members are round in section or is given rounded edges—acknowledging perhaps to the bamboo tradition. The seat is unpleasant to sit in and may have a plaited form. These chairs required of the sitter to hold themselves stiff and upright; for if too much pressure is pushed on the back, the chair has a way of toppling. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this era armchairs probably were reserved only for older members of the family, for they were greatly respected.
The Chinese folding stool is believed to have taken to China from the West. It is akin so very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a difference in that the top rail is delicately affixed to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is generally possessing metal mounts. From a Western perspective the ultimate effect of both these furniture designs is stylized. The constructive and aesthetic issues are combined in a style that is simultaneously naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is an outcome of the manner that the individual parts do not appear to have been affixed by means of either glue or screws, but were mortised on one another and locked into place in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also had its signature on the chair. Artworks project a design of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, having only two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in the layers, stitched to produce a pattern of little pads. The front board and a related board from the back could be folded after loosening some tiny iron hooks. Thus the chair was a readily portable piece of furniture in traveling which, at the same era, had the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered design of chair can be displayed in engravings of the interiors of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this type of chair may also be seen in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not determined that the innovation actually started in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of thin dimensions; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is obviously a bourgeois piece of furniture and was produced in impressive quantities, as surmisable from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a whole row of such chairs lined up along a wall. The style asserts itself with its harmonious proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric edged with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that is to say, as developed in Paris around 1750—disseminated through most of Europe and has been imitated or copied in the mid-20th century. The design owes this popularity to a combination of leisure and elegance. The seat conforms to the human body and allows a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Normally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are constructed solidly on craftsmanlike practices despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those employ wood of quite thick density; but every member is deeply molded, all extra wood has been sanded away, and more expensive designs may be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative woodwork. The wood might be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is used for any upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is in some cases used rather than upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more open in form than the French. The French taste for stylistic uniformity, which came from the aristocratic circles in Paris and Versailles over most of France and was popular in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became well-known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
During the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper brands of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, hint that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office chairs in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.