Out of all furniture needs, the chair might be the primary one. While most other forms (save the bed) are designed to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair can be used here in the most common sense, from stool to throne to complex items like a bench and sofa, which may be looked upon as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously distinguished.
The social history of the chair is as stimulating as its history as an art and craft. The chair is not just a physical support or an aesthetic item; it can also be a symbol of social rank. Within the old royal courts there were social differences between being led to a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but without arms, and having to cope with a stool. During the recent century, a director’s and manager’s chair has been regarded as a signifier of superior standing, as well as in democratic government debate the speaker sits on a raised level.
In its furniture purpose, the chair is used for a range of various makes. There are chairs designed to attend to man’s age and physical abilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and for his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). During past days there were chairs for births (birth chairs); in the 20th century, there have been chairs for ending life (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, and four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We make chairs that can be folded and put away, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our contemporary lifestyle has designated special chairs for automobiles and aircraft. Each and every one of these chair forms have changed to match to differing human uses. Because of its unique relationship with man, the chair comes to its full advantage only when in employ. Although it is irrelevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a bureau if there are things inside or not, a chair is really seen best and fairly judged by a person sitting on it, for chair and sitter require one another. Thus the various limbs of a chair were given labels like the limbs of a human body: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the first work of the chair is to support the human body, its value is tested generally on how well it does fulfill this practical job. Within the creation of the chair, the designer is limited by particular static regulation and principal measurements. Within these limits, however, the chair designer has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair lasted dates of several thousand years. There are civilizations that had made iconic chair shapes, expressive of the leading task in the spheres of skill and creativity. From these such societies, a mention must be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lives of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the construct of expert make, were found from discoveries made in tombs. One of them is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The classical Egyptian chair had four legs crafted akin to those of some animal, a curved seat, leading to a sloping back supported by vertical stretchers. In this way a stable triangular design was obtained. There appears to be no notable variation from the design of Egyptian thrones and chairs for regular peasantry. The only change lies in the kind of ornamentation, in the particulars of expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all likelihood was made for an easily carried seat for army soldiers. As a camp stool the form persisted during much later points. But the stool then also was made as the role of a ceremonial seat, its technical function as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can today be found, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, executed in ebony with ivory inlay work and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were constructed in the construction of folding stools but aren’t able to be folded because the seats are worked from wood. The easy construction of the folding stool, being of two frames that spin on metal bolts and support a seat of leather or fabric fastened between them, then came again some time later from the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best recognised of those is the folding stool, from ashwood, which can now be seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The significant Greek chair, the klismos, is recognised not as any ancient fossil still in form but as in a trove of pictorial objects. The archetype is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial ground near Athens (c. 410 BC). This klismos is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of these legs were seen. These creative legs were most likely crafted in bent wood and were therefore had to bear huge pressure with the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat would have been therefore extremely solid and were overtly denoted.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek design; quite a few statues of seated Romans offer examples of a heavier and in appearance kind of more crudely crafted klismos. Both features, light and heavy, were seen again in the Classicist time. The klismos design is known in French Empire styles, in English Regency, and in some particular brands of marked uniqueness in Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China can not be followed as far back as in Egypt and Greece. From the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an undamaged collection of sketches and artworks has been kept, with images of the interiors and outer parts of Chinese buildings and their furniture. Preserved also since the 16th century are a collection of chairs made of wood or lacquered wood, that show an intriguing likeness to styles of previous chairs.
Same as in Egypt, there were two fundamental chair forms in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. That four-legged chair is seen both with or without arms although always with a square seat and straight stiles (vertical side supports) to firm the back. In one form, though, the stiles had been marginally curved on top of the arms so as to suit the shape of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of the back). Each of the three limbs had been mortised onto the yoke-like top rail. Despite that the style of a back splat then had an inspiration for English chairs in the Queen Anne period, wooden items that merely to a restricted extent stabilise corner joints (and are loose to top it off) signify a signature signatory to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which stops about the rounded staves. All members are round in section or possesses rounded edges—a left over perhaps to the bamboo tradition. The seat is uncomfortable and might have had a plaited bottom. These chairs demanded of the sitter to be stiff and upright; for when too much pressure is forced on the back, the chair has a tendency to topple. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this epoch armchairs probably were reserved for older persons in the family, for they were greatly esteemed.
The Chinese folding stool is presumed to have taken to China from the West. It does not vary much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a dissimilarity in that the top rail is elegantly affixed to the two legs of the stool by a curved member, which is more often than not provided with metal mounts. From a Western understanding the resulting effect of both these furniture designs is stylized. The manufacture and aesthetic aspects are combined in a way that is all at once naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is an outcome of the manner that the individual members do not look to have been joined together by means of either glue or screws, but have been mortised with one another and held in position in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also put its signature on the chair. Works of art project a style of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in the layers, stitched to bring out a pattern of little pads. The front board and a similar board in the back could be folded after unscrewing some little iron hooks. In this way the chair was a portable piece of furniture in traveling which, during the same era, granted the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered design of chair can be found in engravings of interiors of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this kind of chair may also be made in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not certain that the form actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of thin shape; they are occasionally baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is clearly a bourgeois piece of furniture and was manufactured in considerable amounts, as surmisable from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a row of those chairs lined up against a wall. The style asserts itself by its elegant proportions and fine upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of styles—that is to say, as brought out in Paris around 1750—disseminated through most of Europe and was imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The style owes the popularity to a combination of leisure and elegance. The seat conforms to the human body and allows a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Normally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are strongly constructed on craftsmanlike methodology despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those use wood of fairly thick dimensions; but each member is deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been taken away, and more expensive examples can be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative engravings. The wood might be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is generally used for all the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is occasionally used rather than upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more differentiated in style than the French. The French preference for stylistic uniformity, which spread from the most distinguished circles in Paris and Versailles within most of France and became the favourite in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popularised and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper brands of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, purport that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on executive furniture in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.