Of all furniture forms, the chair could be the most imperative. While the majority of other objects (save the bed) are intended to support objects, the chair supports the human form. The term chair can be regarded here in the larger sense, from stool to throne to complex chairs including the bench or sofa, which might be looked upon as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not evidently definitive.
The social history of the chair is as exciting as its history as an art and craft. The chair is not only a physical support or an aesthetic piece of art; it historically was an indicator of social place. In the historical royal courts there were clear differences between being seated on a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but without arms, or having to squat on a stool. In the past century, a director’s and manager’s chair has been an indicator of superior status, as well as in democratic governments the speaker sits on a high-set level.
In its furniture creation, the chair can be employed for a number of various models. There are chairs designed to suit man’s age and physical abilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to show his standing in society (the executive chair, the throne). From the past there were chairs used for birthing (birth chairs); from the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). We design chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can have chairs that can be folded for easy storage, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern living has derived particular chairs for automobiles and aircraft. All these chair types has been changed to match to growing human requirements. From its significant association with man, the chair exists to its full purpose only when utilised. Whereas it isn’t relevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a set of drawers if there are items inside or not, a chair is really seen best and fairly regarded by a person using it, because chair and sitter complement each other. Thus the individual areas of the chair have been labeled corresponding to the parts of the human parts: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the primary work of the chair is to support a human body, its credit is valued firstly from how fully it does fulfill this practical purpose. In the structure of the chair, the builder is bound by the static legislation and principal measurements. Inside these rules, however, the chair builder has marvellous freedom.
The history of the chair extends over an epoch of several thousand years. There are societies that had significant chair forms, seen of the highest endeavour in the spheres of handling and design. In such cultures, individual note should be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lifetimes of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the objects of skilled make, are now known from tomb discoveries. One of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The typical Egyptian chair would have four legs formed not unlike those of a particular animal, a curved seat, with a sloping back supported above vertical stretchers. In this design a durable triangular design was created. There appeared to be no particular variation in the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for ordinary non-royals. The real change existed in the kind of ornamentation, in the selection of more costly inlays. The Egyptian folding stool likely was crafted for an easily packed seat for officers. As a camp stool the type persevered until much later periods. But the stool also then was made as the task of a ceremonial seat, its original task as a folding stool neglected or forgotten. This can now be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, crafted in ebony with ivory inlay work and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are made in the structure of folding stools but are not able to be folded because the seats were formed with wood. The easy structure of the folding stool, composed of two frames that cycle on metal bolts and have a seat of leather or fabric held between them, reappears but somewhat later in the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best known of this kind is the folding stool, made out of ashwood, which can now be seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The archetypal Greek chair, the klismos, is recognised not with any ancient fossil still extant but found in a variety of pictorial items. The iconic kind is the klismos displayed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial ground by Athens (c. 410 BC). This is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of which can be displayed. These curving legs were understood to be created with bent wood and were as such bore a large amount of pressure with the weight of the sitter. The joints joining the legs to the frame of the seat had to be therefore very durable and were clearly denoted.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek chair; existing statues of seated Romans display examples of a denser and are a rather more crudely constructed klismos. Both styles, the light and the heavy, were brought back as part of the Classicist time. The klismos style can be seen in French Empire design, in English Regency, and in some particular kinds of notable uniqueness in Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China cannot be tracked as long as the history of chairs in Egypt and Greece. Since the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed series of drawings and paintings had been protected, showing the interiors and exteriors of Chinese households and the designs of furniture. Another preservation since the 16th century are a trove of chairs of wood or lacquered wood, that display an astonishing likeness to designs of previous chairs.
Just the same as in Egypt, there were two iconic chair forms in China: a chair with four legs and a folding stool. The four-legged chair has been designed both with and without arms but always having the square seat and straight stiles (upright side supports) to give support to the back. In one type, it has been seen, the stiles had been marginally curved on top of the arms to sit right with the form of the S-shaped back splat (the central upright of a back). Together, all three sections were mortised into the yoke-like top rail. Though the innovation of the Chinese back splat later had an influence on English chairs of the Queen Anne period, wooden items that merely to a restricted limit stabilise corner joints (and furthermore are loose to top it off) indicate an element solely to Chinese chairs. The four legs pass through the seat frame, which ends about the rounded staves. All members are round in section or has rounded edges—a left over as may be to the bamboo tradition. The seat is unpleasant to sit in and may have had a plaited form. These chairs required the sitter to remain stiff and upright; for when too much weight is placed on the back, the chair has a way of falling over. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this period armchairs most likely were allowed only for senior members of the family, for they were held in great respect.
The Chinese folding stool is believed to have travelled to China from the West. It does not differ so very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a dissimilarity in that the top rail is prettily held to the two legs of the stool by means of a curved member, which is usually seen with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the ultimate effect of both furniture designs is stylized. The construction and aesthetic aspects are combined in a way that is simultaneously naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is a result of the way that the individual parts do not appear to have been adjoined by means of either glue or screws, but have been mortised on one another and held in position in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also left its mark on the chair. Works of art display a style of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, consisting of two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between the layers, stitched to show up a pattern of small pads. The front board and a corresponding board from the back could be folded after unscrewing some tiny iron hooks. Therefore the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture for traveling which, during the same time, possessed the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair is seen in engravings of the interiors of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this design of chair might also be found in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not determined that the style actually started in The Netherlands. Normally, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of slender dimensions; they are occasionally baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is obviously a bourgeois piece of furniture and was crafted in considerable quantities, as evidenced from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a row of those chairs lined up by a wall. The style asserts itself by virtue of its elegant proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that is, as developed in Paris around 1750—spread through most of Europe and has been imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The chair owes the popularity to a combination of relaxation and delicacy. The seat adheres to the human body and permits a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Usually the seat and back are upholstered, and there are small upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions achieved between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are strongly constructed on craftsmanlike principles in spite of the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them have wood of fairly thick measurements; but each member is deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been removed, and finer items would be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative carvings. The wood can be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is usually used for all of the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is sometimes used rather than upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more open in style than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which spread from the premier circles in Paris and Versailles within most of France and was popularised in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popular and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
In the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper versions of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, indicate that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office furniture in Brisbane contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.