Out of each of the furniture items, the chair could be the primary one. While many other items (except the bed) are meant to support objects, the chair supports our human form. The term chair was used here in the larger sense, from stool to throne to derivative pieces like the bench or sofa, which may be seen as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not overtly labeled.
The social history of the chair is as intriguing as its history as art and craft. The chair is not merely a physical support and an aesthetic item; it was historically semiotic of social place. At the historical royal courts there were significant signifiers between having a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but no arms, or having to squat on a stool. From the past century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has been iconic of superior dignity, like in democratic government debate the speaker sits on a high-set floor.
In its furniture form, the chair is employed for a variety of different models. There are chairs structured to attend to man’s age and physical form (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to indicate his position in society (the executive chair, the throne). In historical times there were chairs used for birthing (birth chairs); in the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). We design chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can make chairs that can be folded for easy storage, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our modern lifestyle has demanded particular chairs for use in automobiles and aircraft. Every one of these chair forms has changed to fit to growing human requirements. Due to its significant link with man, the chair appears to its full importance only when used. Whereas it doesn’t make any difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a dresser drawers whether there might be anything inside or not, a chair is understood and fairly tested with a person utilising it, because chair and sitter need each other. Thus the different parts of a chair are labeled likened to the parts of our human body: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the obvious work of the chair is to support your body, its value is evaluated generally for how suitably it does measure up to this practical use. Within the build of a chair, the designer is limited for some static laws and principal measurements. In these restrictions, however, the chair maker has extensive freedom.
The history of the chair covers an epoch of several thousand years. There existed peoples that made individual chair shapes, expressions of the premier task in the arenas of technique and creativity. Among those peoples, a note can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lifetimes of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the upshot of expert craft, were a finding from tombs. First of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The classical Egyptian chair has four legs crafted as akin to those of an animal, a curved seat, and leading to a sloping back supported above vertical stretchers. In this design a durable triangular design was obtained. There was to all appearances no particular change from the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for regular people. The simple variation lied in the decorative ornamentation, in the choice of costly inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all probability was made as an easily carried seat for army officers. As a camp stool the kind stayed for much later points. But the stool then also was created as the character of a ceremonial seat, its technical history as a folding stool simply forgotten. This can now be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay work and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were constructed in the shape of folding stools but aren’t able to be folded as the seats were worked with wood. The easy construction of the folding stool, made of two frames that cycle on metal bolts and support a seat of leather or fabric set between them, was then seen but somewhat later from the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The better known of these is the folding stool, of ashwood, now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The typical Greek chair, the klismos, is seen not from any ancient specimen still around but as seen in a large amount of pictorial material. The most recognisable is the klismos posited on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial ground just out of Athens (c. 410 BC). This klismos is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of which would be visible. These unusual legs were most likely to be crafted out of bent wood and were therefore subjected to great pressure with the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat are therefore very stable and were clearly drawn.
The Romans emulated the Greek chair; a number of models of seated Romans are chairs of a heavier and in appearance slightly crudely constructed klismos. Both styles, light and heavy, were revived in the Classicist era. The klismos style is found in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in some special types of marked iconicism of Denmark and Sweden from 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China can not be followed as far back as chairs in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) a full series of sketches and works of art has been kept, displaying the interiors and outer parts of Chinese buildings and the kinds of furniture. Preserved also since the 16th century are some chairs constructed from wood or lacquered wood, that display an astonishing likeness to images of previous chairs.
As in Egypt, there were two fundamental chair forms in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. The four-legged chair was found both with or without arms but always with its square seat and straight stiles (straight side supports) to firm the back. In one kind, it has been found, the stiles could be slightly curved over the arms to conform to the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the centre upright of a back). Each of the three parts had been mortised in the yoke-like top rail. While the style of a back splat then had an inspiration for English chairs within the Queen Anne period, wooden items that would only to a limited limit support corner joints (and then are loose additionally) represent a feature signatory to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which stops over the rounded staves. Members are round in section or is given rounded edges—an acknowledgement perchance to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and may have a plaited seat. These chairs required of the sitter to hold themselves stiff and upright; for when too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a tendency to topple. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this epoch armchairs presumably were reserved only for elderly persons in the family, for they were respected greatly.
The Chinese folding stool is thought to have been brought to China from the West. It does not differ so very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a change in that the top rail is elegantly held to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is often designed with metal mounts. From a Western viewpoint the ultimate effect of both furniture designs is stylized. The construction and decoration aspects are combined in a style that is all at once naïve and refined. The patched up appearance is an upshot of the fact that the individual parts do not seem to have been held together by either glue or screws, but are mortised on one another and held in position in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also put its name on the chair. Paintings project a design of chair with a relatively unrefined wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, having only two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between, stitched to bring up a pattern of small pads. The front board and a related board from the back could be folded after unscrewing some small iron hooks. Thus the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture for traveling which, in the same era, granted the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair is found in engravings of the interiors of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this style of chair is also made in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not determined that the style actually was born in The Netherlands. Normally, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of thin dimensions; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is obviously a bourgeois piece of furniture and was crafted in considerable quantities, as surmisable from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which an entire row of these chairs lined up along a wall. The form asserts itself with its shapely proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric edged with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that is to say, as developed in Paris around 1750—conquered most of Europe and was imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The chair owes its popularity to a combination of leisure and elegance. The seat adheres to the human body and grants a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Generally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads over the armrests. Smooth transitions achieved between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are constructed solidly on craftsmanlike methodology even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof are made from wood of relatively thick measurements; but all the members are deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been taken away, and finer examples would be further embellished with very delicate and decorative engravings. The wood might be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry might be used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; crosshatched cane is sometimes used in place of upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more variable in form than the French. The French manner for stylistic uniformity, which spread from the most distinguished circles in Paris and Versailles over most of France and won favour in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popularised and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
In the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper versions of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, indicate that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office storage in Brisbane contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.