Proportional, Progressive, and Regressive taxes
Taxes are differentiated by the effect they have on the allocation of income and wealth. A proportional tax is the kind that puts the same relative burden on all the taxpayers—i.e., when tax liability and income grow in relative scale. A progressive tax is recognised by a more than proportional growth in the tax onus in regard to the rise in income, and a regressive tax is recognisable by a less than proportional increase in the comparative onus. So, progressive taxes are regarded as reducing the lack of equality in income distribution, but regressive taxes might result in an increase these inequalities.
The taxes that are generally considered progressive include individual income taxes and estate taxes. Income taxes that are declarably progressive, however, can become less so within the upper-income class—especially if a taxpayer is allowed to reduce his tax base by nominating deductions or by removing some particular income elements from his taxable income. Proportional tax rates which are applied to lower-income demographics will also be more progressive if personal exemptions are declared.
Income measured over the period of a year might not necessarily offer the most appropriate measure of taxpaying ability. For example, transitory growth in income might be saved, and in temporary declines in income a taxpayer might decide to pay for consumption by taking from savings. So, if taxation is regarded alongside “permanent income,” it should be less regressive (or more progressive) than if it is made comparable with annual income.
Sales taxes and excises (save those on luxuries) tend to be regressive, because the spread of one’s income consumed or spent on a specific good declines as the level of personal income rises. Poll taxes (also termed head taxes), calculated as a standard amount per capita, obviously are regressive.
It is complicated to dictate corporate income taxes and taxes on business as progressive, regressive, or proportionate, principally because of uncertainty regarding the ability of businesses to shift their tax expenses (see below Shifting and incidence). This difficulty of deciding who bears the tax burden lays crucially on whether a national or a subnational (that is, provincial or state) tax is being considered.
In analysing the economic effects of taxation, it is essential to distinguish between several ideas of tax rates. The statutory rates are those specified in legislature; usually these are marginal rates, but sometimes they are mean rates. Marginal income tax rates note the fraction of incremental income that is demanded by taxation when income rises by one dollar. Therefore, if tax liability increases by 45 cents when income rises by one dollar, the marginal tax rate is 45 percent. Income tax legislation commonly contain graduated marginal rates—i.e., rates that rise as income grows. Heavy analysis of marginal tax rates must regard provisions as well as the formal statutory rate structure. If, for example, a particular tax credit (reduction in tax) lowers by 20 cents for each one-dollar rise in income, the marginal rate is 20 percentage points higher than indicated within the statutory rates. Since marginal rates display how after-tax income increases or decreases in response to changes in before-tax income, they are the important ones for appraising incentive effects of taxation. It is even more complicated to understand the marginal effective tax rate applied to income from business and capital, as it may be reliant on such factors as the structure of depreciation allowances, the deductibility of interest, and the provisions for inflation adjustment. A basic economic theorem holds that the marginal effective tax rate in income from capital is nothing under a consumption-based tax.
Average income tax rates display the fraction of total income that is paid in taxation. The pattern of average rates is the one that is in consideration for assessing the distributional equity of taxation. Under a progressive income tax the average income tax rate grows with income. Average income tax rates commonly grow with income, both because personal allowances are granted for the taxpayer and dependents and also due to that marginal tax rates are graduated; conversely, preferential treatment of income received predominantly by high-income households might dwarf these effects, allowing regressivity, as displayed by average tax rates that lessen as income rises.
For MYOB Brisbane expert advice, contact Stone Consulting today. Stone Consulting also runs MYOB training in Brisbane.
