Out of all furniture objects, the chair might be primary. While the majority of other pieces (except the bed) are designed to support objects, the chair supports your human form. The term chair is intended to be used here in the wider sense, from stool to throne to developed chairs including the bench or sofa, which might be viewed as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not evidently distinuishable.
The social history of the chair is as stimulating as its history as a creative craft. The chair is not simply a physical support or aesthetic object; it historically was a symbol of social place. In the past royal courts there were significant connotations between being led to a chair with arms, sitting on a chair with a back but no arms, or worse having to cope with a stool. Since the last century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has been regarded as an identifier of superior rank, like in democratic government debate the speaker sits on an elevated level.
In a furniture creation, the chair is utilised for a variety of different purposes. There are chairs created to match man’s age and physical form (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to denote his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). In historical days there were chairs for birthing (birth chairs); from the 20th century, there have been chairs used for ending life (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, and four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We make chairs that can be folded and put away, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Contemporary lifestyle has demanded particular chairs for use in automobiles and aircraft. All of these chair forms have been adapted to fit to growing human needs. Due to its particular relationship with man, the chair comes to its full advantage only when in employ. Although it doesn’t make a difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a bureau whether there are items inside or not, a chair is really understood and fairly evaluated by a person utilising it, for chair and sitter suit each other. Thus the several limbs of the chair are given labels corresponding to the limbs of the human body: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the obvious purpose of the chair is to support our body, its worth is judged primarily for how well it fulfills this practical use. In the creation of the chair, the carpenter is restricted for certain static laws and principal measurements. Under these restrictions, however, the chair builder has large freedom.
The history of the chair extends over a period of several thousand years. There is evidence of civilizations that held unique chair types, as expressions of the foremost object in the arenas of handling and design. In these civilisations, individual note needs to be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lives of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the structures of careful scheme, are now found from tombs. First of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The classical Egyptian chair had four legs formed as akin to those of some animal, a curved seat, leading to a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. In this design a durable triangular design was made. There seems to be no significant differentiation between the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for ordinary peasantry. The real change was in the level of ornamentation, in the selection of more costly inlays. The Egyptian folding stool probably was designed for an easily carried seat for officers. As a camp stool this stool existed during much later times. But the stool also existed in the task of a ceremonial seat, its technical role as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can from today’s evidence be found, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, crafted in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were in the form of folding stools but aren’t able to be folded as the seats were worked with wood. The plain construction of the folding stool, composed of two frames that rotate on metal bolts and have a seat of leather or fabric held between them, was seen again some time later from the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best known of those is the folding stool, crafted out of ashwood, now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The unique Greek chair, the klismos, is known not with any ancient object still in form but as found in a trove of pictorial evidence. The best known is the klismos depicted on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial ground just out of Athens (c. 410 BC). It is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of those legs can be seen. These unique legs were thought to be crafted in bent wood and were thus subjected to a large amount of pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints fastening the legs to the frame of the seat would have had to be therefore extremely stable and were clearly pointed out.
The Romans adopted the Greek design; quite a few models of seated Romans show designs of a thicker and in appearance slightly more crudely designed klismos. Both features, the light or heavy, were seen again within the Classicist period. The klismos style is found in French Empire design, in English Regency, and in some forms of marked uniqueness of Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China is not able to be charted as long as in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) a full serial of sketches and artworks has been kept, with images of the interiors and exterior of Chinese households and the furniture. Another preservation of the 16th century are a number of chairs constructed from wood or lacquered wood, that hold an amazing resemblance to styles of ancient chairs.
Like in Egypt, there existed two standard chair designs in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. The four-legged chair is found both with or without arms although never missing a square seat and straight stiles (straight side supports) to firm the back. In one kind, it has been found, the stiles were slightly curved above the arms in order to sit correctly with the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the basic upright of its chairback). Together, the three parts are mortised into the yoke-like top rail. Though the idea of this back splat later had an influence on English chairs within the Queen Anne period, wooden items that only to a limited extent support corner joints (and furthermore were loose in the result) represent an element signatory to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which ends around the rounded staves. Members are round in section or possesses rounded edges—an acknowledgement maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and may have had a plaited texture. These chairs needed the sitter to stay stiff and upright; for when too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a tendency to topple. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this epoch armchairs probably were kept only for older members of the family, for they were given great respect.
The Chinese folding stool is understood to have travelled to China from the West. It is akin very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a dissimilarity in that the top rail is intricately fixed to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is often seen with metal mounts. From a Western perspective the resultant effect of these furniture designs is stylized. The manufacture and decorative aspects are combined in a way that is all at once naïve and refined. The patched up appearance is an outcome of the fact that the individual items do not appear to have been fixed by either glue or screws, but had been mortised with one another and fixed in position in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also put its mark on the chair. Artworks show a type of chair with a relatively unrefined wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between, stitched to show up a pattern of little pads. The front board and a related board in the back could be folded after loosening some tiny iron hooks. In this way the chair was a readily portable piece of furniture for traveling which, during the same time, possessed the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered kind of chair can be found in engravings of interiors of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this design of chair can also be seen in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not decided that the design actually was born in The Netherlands. Typically, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of slim dimensions; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is unquestionably a bourgeois piece of furniture and was crafted in large numbers, as can be surmised from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is an entire row of those chairs lined up by a wall. The design asserts itself with its shapely proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric edged with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that was, as brought out in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and was imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The model owes such popularity to a combination of leisure and delicacy. The seat suits to the human body and allows a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Typically the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions made between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are strongly constructed on craftsmanlike methodology despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those are constructed from wood of quite thick measurements; but all members are deeply molded, all extra wood has been removed, and more upmarket chairs would be further embellished with special delicate and decorative carvings. The wood might be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry should be used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; crosshatched cane is in some cases used instead of upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more open in style than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which came from the highest circles in Paris and Versailles throughout most of France and became the favourite in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popular and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper brands of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office chairs in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.