Out of all furniture forms, the chair may be the paramount one. While most of the other objects (apart from the bed) are intended to support objects, the chair supports our human form. The term chair should be viewed here in the most general sense, from stool to throne to complex kinds such as a bench and sofa, which may be regarded as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not evidently distinuishable.
The social history of the chair is as curious as its history as a creative craft. The chair is not just a physical support and aesthetic creation; it historically was symbolic of social rank. In the Medieval royal courts there were clear differences between being seated on a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but without arms, and having to make do with a stool. In the last century, a director’s or manager’s chair has been seen as iconic of superior status, and even in democratic government meeting the speaker sits on a higher level.
In its furniture form, the chair encompasses a range of various models. There are chairs created to attend to man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to denote his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). From historical days there were chairs used for birthing (birth chairs); since the 20th century, there have been chairs for ending life (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We make chairs that can be folded, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our modern lifestyle has designated special chairs in automobiles and aircraft. All these chair types has been adapted to conform to changing human desires. Due to its close link with man, the chair appears to its full importance only when being used. While it isn’t relevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a set of drawers if there is anything inside or not, a chair is seen best and fairly judged with a person sitting on it, because chair and sitter require one another. Thus the different parts of a chair have been labeled as the names of the human parts: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the obvious function of a chair is to support the body, its credit is valued primarily from how fully it does fulfill this practical role. In the construction of the chair, the maker is limited within particular static regulation and principal measurements. Inside these limitations, however, the chair builder has marvellous freedom.
The history of the chair extended over a period of several thousand years. There are societies that had made distinctive chair forms, seen of the premier task in the areas of skill and design. Within those societies, special note can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lifetimes of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the result of careful scheme, are now known from discoveries made in tombs. The first of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The classical Egyptian chair would have had four legs shaped akin to those of an animal, a curved seat, and with a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. From this a strong triangular structure was obtained. There was from our knowledge no notable change from the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical peasantry. The main change existed in the intricacy of ornamentation, in the particulars of expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all probability was created as an easily packed seat for army officers. As a camp stool that type persisted during much later periods. But the stool then was created for the role of a ceremonial seat, its mechanical history as a folding stool neglected or forgotten. This can now be found, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, crafted in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are in the shape of folding stools but aren’t able to be folded as the seats were made with wood. The plain structure of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that rotate on metal bolts and bear a seat of leather or fabric fastened between them, also appeared some time later from the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most recognisable of this form is the folding stool, of ashwood, now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The unique Greek chair, the klismos, is known not with any ancient specimen still around but from a variety of pictorial objects. The best known is the klismos depicted on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial area just out of Athens (c. 410 BC). The klismos is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of those are visible. These curved legs were thought to have been manufactured with bent wood and were probably needed to bear a large amount of pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints joining the legs to the frame of the seat are therefore super stable and were particularly denoted.
The Romans emulated the Greek chair; existing models of seated Romans offer chairs of a denser and in appearance slightly less intricately designed klismos. Both features, the light or the heavy, were revived in the Classicist period. The klismos influence is found in French Empire design, in English Regency, and in particular forms of marked individuality within Denmark and Sweden from 1800.
China
The past of the chair in China can not be traced as far as the progression of the chairs in Egypt and Greece. Since the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an undamaged series of images and artworks has been protected, with images of the interior and exterior of Chinese homes and the furniture. Also kept of the 16th century are a trove of chairs constructed from wood or lacquered wood, that bear an astonishing similarity to designs of older chairs.
Just the same as in Egypt, two particular chair forms existed in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. This chair can be found both with and without arms but never missing a square seat and straight stiles (upright side supports) to give support to the back. In one design, it has been found, the stiles were marginally curved by the arms to suit the shape of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of the back). The three areas are mortised into the yoke-like top rail. Although the design of the Chinese back splat later had an influence on English chairs in the Queen Anne period, wooden members that could merely to a particular limit embolden corner joints (as well as being loose into the bargain) are an element exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which closes upon the rounded staves. All the members are round in section or possesses rounded edges—referable maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not comfortable and occasionally had a plaited texture. These chairs needed the sitter to stay stiff and upright; for if too much pressure is pushed on the back, the chair has a way of falling over. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this era armchairs most likely were kept only for older persons, for they were greatly respected.
The Chinese folding stool is understood to have come to China from the West. It is not dissimilar very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a dissimilarity in that the top rail is prettily fixed to the two legs of the stool by means of a curved member, which is often provided with metal mounts. From a Western understanding the ultimate effect of these two furniture designs is stylized. The constructive and aesthetic elements are combined in a way that is all at once both naïve and refined. The pieced-together appearance is a result of the way that the individual items do not appear to have been fixed by means of either glue or screws, but had been mortised with one another and fixed in place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also put its name on the chair. Paintings display a kind of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in the layers, stitched to produce a pattern of little pads. The front board and a related board from the back could be folded after unscrewing some small iron hooks. Thus the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture for traveling which, in the same time, possessed the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered design of chair is displayed in engravings of interiors of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this type of chair can also be found in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won favour, it is not certain that the style actually began in The Netherlands. Normally, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of thin shape; they are occasionally baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is patently a bourgeois piece of furniture and was made in vast quantities, as indicated from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a whole row of this kind of chairs lined up against a wall. The design asserts itself with its shapely proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of forms—that is, as developed in Paris around 1750—disseminated through most of Europe and has been imitated or copied in the mid-20th century. The chair owes its popularity to a combination of relaxation and elegance. The seat suits to the human body and grants a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Normally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are small upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are solidly constructed on craftsmanlike principles even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them are made from wood of quite thick dimensions; but every member is deeply molded, all extra wood has been sanded away, and more expensive examples can be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative carvings. The wood could be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry can be used for all the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; canework is occasionally used instead of upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more varied in design than the French. The French taste for stylistic uniformity, which lead from the highest circles in Paris and Versailles throughout most of France and became the preference in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popularised and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper versions of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office chairs in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.