Out of each of the furniture objects, the chair could be the paramount one. While many other objects (save the bed) are designed to support objects, the chair supports your human form. The term chair was used here in the most common sense, from stool to throne to derivative kinds like the bench or sofa, which might be regarded as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not overtly labeled.
The social history of the chair is as stimulating as its history as art and craft. The chair is not simply a physical support and an aesthetic piece of art; it was also a signifier of social ranking. At the Medieval royal courts there were social distinctions between having a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but no arms, or having to utilise a stool. From the past century, a director’s or manager’s chair has been iconic of superior position, and even in democratic government meeting the speaker sits on a higher level.
As a furniture purpose, the chair is utilised for a wealth of various makes. There are chairs manufactured to fit man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to connotate his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). From the past there were chairs to be born in (birth chairs); during the 20th century, there have been chairs for ending life (the electric chair). There are chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We have chairs that can be folded, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our modern lifestyle has designated particular chairs in automobiles and aircraft. All of these chair shapes has been perfected to suit to changing human needs. From its close relationship with man, the chair comes to its full purpose only when in use. Although it does not make any difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a bureau if there might be things inside or not, a chair is understood and judged with a person sitting on it, for chair and sitter require the other. Thus the various parts of the chair are labeled likened to the elements of a human form: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the first purpose of a chair is to support our human body, its worth is evaluated basically by how well it fulfills this practical role. Within the design of a chair, the maker is restricted by particular static law and principal measurements. Within these limits, however, the chair builder has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair was a period of several thousand years. There is evidence of cultures that created unique chair shapes, as expressions of the highest endeavour in the industries of technique and design. Among those peoples, special note needs to be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the ascendancy of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the construct of careful craft, are known from tombs. The first one of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The classical Egyptian chair had four legs formed similar to those of an animal, a curved seat, leading to a sloping back supported with vertical stretchers. From this design a strong triangular construction was made. There was in our view no marked change between the design of Egyptian thrones and chairs for regular non-royals. The general variation existed in the brand of ornamentation, in the selection of more expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool most likely was developed to be an easily carried seat for army officers. As a camp stool that kind stayed around until much later periods. But the stool then also was designed as the character of a ceremonial seat, its original task as a folding stool ignored or forgotten. This can from evidence be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, crafted in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are in the construction of folding stools but cannot be folded as the seats were created from wood. The simplistic make of the folding stool, made of two frames that rotate on metal bolts and support a seat of leather or fabric fastened between them, is seen again but some time later from the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best recognised of this form is the folding stool, crafted from ashwood, found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The significant Greek chair, the klismos, is known not from any ancient fossil still around but as seen in a trove of pictorial items. The best known is the klismos seen on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial area by Athens (c. 410 BC). It is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of those legs can be shown. These unique legs were likely to have been crafted with bent wood and were probably put under great pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints joining the legs to the frame of the seat were therefore extremely strong and were overtly indicated.
The Romans adopted the Greek design; some models of seated Romans offer examples of a heavier and in appearance somewhat less delicately constructed klismos. Both styles, the light or heavy, were seen again as part of the Classicist era. The klismos chair is known in French Empire styles, in English Regency, and in some particular brands of considerable uniqueness in Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The past of the chair in China can not be tracked as far back as the progression of the chairs in Egypt and Greece. Since the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed collection of images and artworks had been kept safe, displaying the inside and outside of Chinese houses and the kinds of furniture. Kept also from the 16th century are a number of chairs made from wood or lacquered wood, that bear an astonishing familiarity to designs of previous chairs.
As in Egypt, two iconic chair forms existed in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. The four-legged chair has been designed both with and without arms however always having the square seat and straight stiles (vertical side supports) to firm the back. In one image, it has been found, the stiles are slightly curved over the arms so as to sit correctly with the form of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of its chairback). Together, all three parts are mortised in the yoke-like top rail. Though the style of this back splat later had an influence on English chairs of the Queen Anne period, wooden pieces that just to a particular limit reinforce corner joints (and furthermore were loose as a result) represent a signature signatory to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which finishes over the rounded staves. All members are round in section or have rounded edges—references as may be to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and may have a plaited form. These chairs required the sitter to hold themselves stiff and upright; if too much pressure is placed on the back, the chair has a habit of collapsing. In patriarchal Chinese households of this period armchairs most likely were kept only for senior individuals, for they were greatly esteemed.
The Chinese folding stool is presumed to have come to China from the West. It does not differ very much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a dissimilarity in that the top rail is delicately held to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is more often than not provided with metal mounts. From a Western viewpoint the overall effect of both of these furniture items is stylized. The construction and decoration issues are combined in a style that is simultaneously naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is an upshot of the way that the individual members do not appear to have been adjoined with either glue or screws, but are mortised onto one another and locked into its place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also left its mark on the chair. Works of art project a style of chair with a relatively crude wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, consisting of two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between, stitched to bring out a pattern of little pads. The front board and a similar board from the back could be folded after loosening some little iron hooks. In this way the chair was a portable piece of furniture in traveling which, in the same time, granted the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered kind of chair is evidenced in engravings of the interiors of affluent Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this type of chair can also be seen in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won critical acclaim, it is not held that the innovation actually started in The Netherlands. Typically, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of thin measurements; they are occasionally baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is unquestionably a bourgeois piece of furniture and was manufactured in vast amounts, as indicated from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which an entire row of those chairs lined up by a wall. The design asserts itself with its shapely proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that is to say, as created in Paris around 1750—spread through most of Europe and has been imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The chair owes its popularity to a combination of relaxation and delicacy. The seat suits to the human body and grants a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Normally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are strongly constructed on craftsmanlike methods even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those are made from wood of quite thick density; but all the members are deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been removed, and more upmarket examples may be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative engravings. The wood might be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is often used for all upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; canework is occasionally used as an alternative to upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more open in style than the French. The French manner for stylistic uniformity, which disseminated from the royal circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and became the preference in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became well-known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper styles of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office storage in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.