From all the furniture forms, the chair might be the imperative one. While the majority of other items (except the bed) are devised to support objects, the chair supports our human form. The term chair should be used here in the widest sense, from stool to throne to complex items for example a bench and sofa, which should be viewed as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not evidently defined.
The social history of the chair is as exciting as its history as art and craft. The chair is not simply a physical support and aesthetic craft; it can also be an indicator of social standing. Within the Medieval royal courts there were clear connotations between being led to a chair with arms, sitting on a chair with a back but without arms, and having to sit on a stool. From the 20th century, a director’s or manager’s chair has developed an identifier of superior position, and in democratic government meeting the speaker sits on an elevated platform.
As its furniture creation, the chair can be utilised for a range of different purposes. There are chairs created to match man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to connotate his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). During the olden days there were chairs used for birth (birth chairs); in the 20th century, there have been chairs used for ending life (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We have chairs that can be folded, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Contemporary lifestyle has designated particular chairs for use in automobiles and aircraft. Each of these chair shapes have been evolved to suit to evolving human desires. For its significant importance with man, the chair appears to its full purpose only when being utilised. Though it isn’t relevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a bureau whether there might be anything inside or not, a chair is really seen and evaluated with a person sitting on it, because chair and sitter require the other. Thus the various elements of the chair were named like the elements of a human shape: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the principal role of a chair is to support the body, its worth is valued basically by how completely it does fulfill this practical function. In the manufacture of a chair, the maker is bound under particular static regulations and principal measurements. Within these regulations, however, the chair builder has extensive freedom.
The history of the chair covers a period of several thousand years. There were societies that had iconic chair shapes, as seen of the premier endeavour in the industries of skill and art. Within such peoples, individual note must be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the ascendancy of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the construct of careful design, were found from tomb findings. One of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The classical Egyptian chair has four legs shaped as akin to those of a particular animal, a curved seat, leading to a sloping back supported over vertical stretchers. In this design a strong triangular structure was created. There was in our view no noteworthy variation in the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for regular people. The only change lied in the intricacy of its ornamentation, in the selection of expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool most likely was developed to be an easily portable seat for army soldiers. As a camp stool this chair existed for much later points. But the stool then also was designed for the purpose of a ceremonial seat, its original function as a folding stool neglected or forgotten. This can now be observed, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay work and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are in the construction of folding stools but are not able to be folded as the seats were made with wood. The simplistic construction of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that rotate on metal bolts and have a seat of leather or fabric set between them, appeared again at some time later as the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most well known of this type is the folding stool, of ashwood, seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The unique Greek chair, the klismos, is found not as any ancient object still extant but as in a large amount of pictorial evidence. The best recognised is the klismos drawn on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location in outer Athens (c. 410 BC). This klismos is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of these legs could be seen. These unique legs were most likely created in bent wood and were therefore subjected to a large amount of pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat would have had to be therefore super durable and were overtly drawn.
The Romans adopted the Greek designs; evidence of statues of seated Romans are evidence of a more heavyset and are a slightly less intricately constructed klismos. Both styles, the light or heavy, were brought back as part of the Classicist epoch. The klismos style is used in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in special types of marked iconicism of Denmark and Sweden during 1800.
China
The ancestry of the chair in China is not able to be tracked as well as chairs in Egypt and Greece. From the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unbroken collection of drawings and works of art was kept safe, displaying the interiors and outer parts of Chinese households and the kinds of furniture. Kept also since the 16th century are a trove of chairs made from wood or lacquered wood, that display an astonishing familiarity to pictures of previous chairs.
Just like in Egypt, there were two particular chair forms in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. That four-legged chair was seen both with and without arms though never without the square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to give support to the back. In one image, it has been seen, the stiles could be lightly curved over the arms in order to fit the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the basic upright of its back). The three sections had been mortised onto the yoke-like top rail. Despite that the style of a back splat exercised an inspiration for English chairs of the Queen Anne period, wooden items that would merely to a limited ability reinforce corner joints (and furthermore were loose additionally) indicate an element particular to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which ends upon the rounded staves. Each member is round in section or is given rounded edges—referable as may be to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not comfortable and had on occasion a plaited seat. These chairs required of the sitter to stay stiff and upright; for when too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a tendency to fall over. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this epoch armchairs presumably were reserved only for older family members, for they were held in great esteem.
The Chinese folding stool is understood to have come to China from the West. It does not vary much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a difference in that the top rail is intricately affixed to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is often possessing metal mounts. From a Western point of view the resulting effect of both these furniture styles is stylized. The manufacture and decoration elements are combined in a manner that is all at once both naïve and refined. The pieced-together appearance is an outcome of the manner that the individual members do not appear to have been fixed together with either glue or screws, but were mortised on one another and locked into place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also left its name on the chair. Works of art show a type of chair with a relatively unrefined wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, consisting of two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between the layers, stitched to bring out a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a corresponding board in the back could be folded after unscrewing some little iron hooks. In this way the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture for traveling which, during the same time, gave the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair can be evidenced in engravings of the interiors of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this type of chair can also be made in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not certain that the innovation actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Generally, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of slender measurements; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is patently a bourgeois piece of furniture and was manufactured in impressive amounts, as can be seen from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which an entire row of this kind of chairs lined up against a wall. The design asserts itself with its harmonious proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that is to say, as created in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and was imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The chair owes this popularity to a combination of leisure and delicacy. The seat conforms to the human body and permits a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Usually the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions are found between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are constructed on craftsmanlike methodology despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them have wood of fairly thick measurements; but all the members are deeply molded, all extra wood has been taken away, and finer chairs may be further embellished with highly delicate and decorative engraving. The wood may be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is usually used for all the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is sometimes used instead of upholstery.
English chairs from the 18th century were more open in design than the French. The French taste for stylistic uniformity, which spread from the aristocratic circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and won favour in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popular and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
During the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper brands of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office chairs in Brisbane contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.