Out of each of the furniture objects, the chair may be of the most importance. While most of the other items (save the bed) are designed to support objects, the chair supports our human form. The term chair should be looked upon here in the wider sense, from stool to throne to complex kinds for example a bench and sofa, which should be considered as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not overtly defined.
The social history of the chair is as stimulating as its history as an art and craft. The chair is not simply a physical support and aesthetic creation; it historically was semiotic of social standing. At the historical royal courts there were clear differences between having a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but no arms, or worse having to use a stool. Since the last century, the director’s and/or manager’s chair has become iconic of superior dignity, as well as in democratic government meeting the speaker sits on a higher floor.
In a furniture form, the chair can be used for a variety of various makes. There are chairs designed to attend to man’s age and physical condition (the high chair, the wheelchair) and for his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). Since historical times there were chairs to be born in (birth chairs); from the 20th century, there have been chairs used for ending life (the electric chair). There are chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We make chairs that can be folded up, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our contemporary lifestyle has demanded particular chairs for use in automobiles and aircraft. All these chair kinds have been changed to suit to growing human uses. For its unique association with man, the chair appears to its full purpose only when in employ. Though it isn’t relevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a bureau if there are things inside or not, a chair is understood best and evaluated by a person using it, because chair and sitter require the other. Thus the different elements of the chair were named according to the areas of a human parts: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the simple purpose of a chair is to support a human body, its credit is evaluated principally from how suitably it fulfills this practical job. In the construction of a chair, the carpenter is bound by the static regulations and principal measurements. Within these boundaries, however, the chair maker has marvellous freedom.
The history of the chair lasted dates of several thousand years. There is evidence of peoples that made significant chair forms, expressive of the principal object in the spheres of handling and art. In these such peoples, a mention can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lifetimes of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the result of skilled craft, are now found from tombs. First of them is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The typical Egyptian chair has four legs designed not unlike those of some animal, a curved seat, leading to a sloping back supported above vertical stretchers. In this design a stable triangular design was obtained. There was in our knowledge no particular differentiation from the design of Egyptian thrones and chairs for regular populace. The general difference was in the type of ornamentation, in the particulars of more expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all likelihood was manufactured to be an easily carried seat for army officers. As a camp stool the chair persevered for much later periods of time. But the stool also then was created as the purpose of a ceremonial seat, its mechanical history as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can from evidence be observed, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, crafted in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are in the form of folding stools but cannot be folded because the seats were formed with wood. The plain construction of the folding stool, being of two frames that spin on metal bolts and bear a seat of leather or fabric set between them, appeared again but somewhat later during the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best recognised of this type is the folding stool, crafted from ashwood, which is now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The iconic Greek chair, the klismos, is seen not from any ancient object still existing but seen in a trove of pictorial material. The significant kind is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial ground outside Athens (c. 410 BC). It is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of these legs can be shown. These unusual legs were thought to be executed with bent wood and were therefore put under great pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints securing the legs to the frame of the seat were therefore extremely strong and were plainly denoted.
The Romans emulated the Greek design; evidence of casts of seated Romans display chairs of a thicker and apparently kind of more crudely built klismos. Both designs, light and heavy, were brought back as part of the Classicist era. The klismos influence is used in French Empire design, in English Regency, and in some special forms of marked individuality around Denmark and Sweden during 1800.
China
The past of the chair in China can not be charted as far as that of Egypt and Greece. Since the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) a full serial of drawings and paintings had been kept, showing the interiors and outer parts of Chinese households and the designs of furniture. Also preserved from the 16th century are a trove of chairs made of wood or lacquered wood, that show an intriguing likeness to images of ancient chairs.
As in Egypt, there were two iconic chair forms in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. That four-legged chair can be designed both with or without arms though always with a square seat and straight stiles (straight side supports) to hold up the back. In one style, though, the stiles could be marginally curved by the arms in order to sit correctly with the angle of the S-shaped back splat (the central upright of the chairback). The three areas are mortised on the yoke-like top rail. While the design of this back splat exercised an influence on English chairs in the Queen Anne period, wooden pieces that merely to a limited ability stabilise corner joints (and then are loose into the bargain) represent a feature particular to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which closes around the rounded staves. Each member is round in section or possesses rounded edges—referable maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is unpleasant to sit in and occasionally had a plaited seat. These chairs needed the sitter to stay stiff and upright; when too much pressure is exerted on the back, the chair has a way of toppling over. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this epoch armchairs probably were kept only for elderly individuals, for they were given great esteem.
The Chinese folding stool is presumed to have taken to China from the West. It is not dissimilar so very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a change in that the top rail is prettily fixed to the two legs of the stool by means of a curved member, which is often designed with metal mounts. From a Western perspective the overall effect of both furniture styles is stylized. The constructive and decorative parts are combined in a style that is simultaneously naïve and refined. The patched up appearance is a result of the way that the individual items do not seem to have been adjoined with either glue or screws, but were mortised on one another and locked into its place in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also put its name on the chair. Artworks show a type of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, with two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between the layers, stitched to produce a pattern of small pads. The front board and a related board from the back could be folded after loosening some little iron hooks. Therefore the chair was a portable piece of furniture while traveling which, in the same time, possessed the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair is found in engravings of the interior of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this type of chair may also be seen in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not held that the design actually began in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of slender measurements; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is obviously a bourgeois piece of furniture and was crafted in considerable amounts, as can be surmised from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which an entire row of these chairs lined up against a wall. The design asserts itself by virtue of its shapely proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that is to say, as progressed in Paris around 1750—disseminated through most of Europe and has been imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The design owes its popularity to a combination of leisure and charm. The seat conforms to the human body and grants a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Generally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are small upholstered pads over the armrests. Smooth transitions made between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are constructed on craftsmanlike methodology even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof use wood of relatively thick measurements; but all members are deeply molded, all extra wood has been cut away, and more expensive chairs may be further embellished with highly delicate and decorative carving. The wood can be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is often used for all upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; canework is in some cases used instead of upholstery.
English chairs from the 18th century were more varied in design than the French. The French manner for stylistic uniformity, which came from the highest circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and found favour in large parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became reknowned and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper styles of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on executive furniture in Sydney contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.